HOME      ANGRY PROPHET        DEM/REP COALITION        NEW HORIZONS        THERSITES         RULES         F.A.Q.      ABOUT US     WHAT'S NEXT?

Under Construction













Scenes 1-2

Scenes 3-11

Scenes 12-17

Scenes 18-25

Scenes 26-39

Scenes 40-46

Scenes 47-59



LETTERS - current

LETTERS - archived

ESSAYS - current

ESSAYS - archived

POLLS - current

POLLS - archived


 Better to light a candle than curse in the dark.



Zarqawi Killed


















and other Droll  Stories


* * *


This is a hell of a lot of work, I'll kid you not, and we are getting far to old to continue doing much of anything besides paying the bills.

  So if any of you website experts out there would like to take over managing this website, please contact us at the  address in in the Contact box at the bottom of this page. 


We'd really like to hear from you.

* * *

    Can there by any doubt that Terrorism, in all its forms, is the greatest problem facing us today?  Not just the people of the United States, but of the whole world.  For there is not a single major problem facing us today that can be solved with the resources presently at our disposal, that is not now made virtually impossible with the specter of terrorism and global war hanging over us all.

    Nor can there be any doubt that the best solution to this problem cannot conceivably be reached by discussions between us and our elected representatives because the best minds of our Western civilization have not produced even a plausible solution other than to kill the nuts on the other side before they kill us. 

    Quite simply, this problem is a malignant cancer that has been festering for generations and is fed by such diseases as poverty, over-population, profound weather changes, religious mania, and the ruthless ambitions of powerful men.  Truly, Whom the Gods would destroy, they first make mad.

    So why are we talking about it at all?  What kind of hubris do we suffer from that we can imagine that anything we or you can say or do will make the slightest difference?

    Well, first we can try to understand and isolate the various historical and present forces that brought us to the brink of this abyss.  Then we can try to minimize the passions and the rhetoric that deeply divide our own people and make solutions, even survival, much more difficult. 

 Fact Number One is that roughly 568 million human beings comprising what we call Western or Christian Civilization have been under attack, on and off, by some 1.8 billion human beings comprising the Muslim World, a struggle which grew out of the collapse of the Greco-Roman civilization which was sustained by superior military force and what might roughly be described as the rule of lawWith the disintegration of a social order ostensibly based on objective legal principals, society collapsed into pockets of power which were gradually brought to some measure of stability by appeals to religious mysticism backed by state-controlled violence. 

  Today the struggle for control of the Holy Land of both Christian and Muslim fanatics is fueled by such powerful economic forces as exponentially growing populations of impoverished people being driven off their ancestral lands by an ever-growing belt of arid desert land underlain by vast pools of petroleum which are vital to the continued existence of modern affluent civilized society as we know it and virtually all human beings of our world aspire to.


which grew on the remnants of earlier civilizations and populate a belt around 1/3rd of the midriff of our globe and squats atop some 70 percent of the world's oil reserves, the primary non-renewable energy source of Western Civilization. 

     This oil reserve is also about the only major resource available to the Muslim world to sustain its huge and growing population, and we are consuming it at a rate that is truly alarming from the point of view of both social orders.  So the struggle isn't entirely ideological.  It's basic dog-eat-dog survival.

     Now where do we fit into the statistical, geopolitical picture?  The United States, Canada, and Western Europe -- the core of Western Civilization that is the most dependent upon Muslim oil -- have a total population of approximately 568 million, and, except in its dependency on oil, is far from united.  The world's Muslim population -- the sector most vulnerable to (a) the depletion of its oil and (b) its ideological fanatics -- totals some 1.8 billion.  They outnumber us by a ratio of 4 to 1, which means they can breed four times as fast as we can, which means we must either kill them at a ratio of 4 to 1 just to stay even, or face extinction, or resolve the problem some other way.

Christian statisticians fix their world population at 2.1 billion people, but this number is misleading for use in a geopolitical analysis because the major part of this population is not politically relevant, residing in notoriously impoverished parts of the the globe and not vitally dependent on Muslim oil.

 The geopolitical struggle of our time commenced with the advent of Israel following the end of WW-II between a West-ern Civilization of 568 million oil burners and an increasingly aggressive population of some 1.8 billion Muslim oil owners.  While the rest of the world -- some 4 billion in all of many races and nationalities with massive population-related problems of their own -- watch with growing alarm.

  So how is it all going to play out, folks?  Where do we start?  Or do we just sit back and let Nature take her course?

  Perhaps we had best stop looking at ourselves as especially favored creatures, created in God's image and, somehow or other, immune to the iron laws of our universe, which also presumably were created by God?  And one of those immutable laws is that animal populations which exceed their boundaries of space and food supply become plagues, diseases that periodically arise, consume themselves, and then subside to either repeat the process or become extinct.

    On this latter point, if you care about the effect human beings are having on our global environment, take a look at the Angriest Prophet story our roving reporter, Yuri Thersites, just posted.  It may change the way you look at your little egocentric world.

* * *




     Some folks -- they call themselves Liberals -- say that one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter, and think dog-piling and putting women's panties on the heads of naked Muslims are atrocities.  Just a matter of seman-tics, like "It all depends upon what you mean by 'is'."

    Well, some other folks who think it's something more than a play on words, circulated the following e-mail to illustrate that the difference may be much deeper than that.  Sometimes it depends upon who the enemy is.  

     Whatever, let us know whether you like this kind of thing -- one way or the other.  God only knows how many computers it passed through before reaching us.



A Message from the Ghost of General Patton....


To those whining, panty-waisted, pathetic Maggots, it's time for a little refresher course on exactly why we Americans occasionally have to fight wars.





  See if you can tear yourself away from your    "reality" TV and Starbucks for a minute, pull your head out of your flabby ass, and


 Abu Ghraib is not "torture" or an "atrocity".

 This is the kind of thing frat boys, sorority girls, and academy cadets do to freshmen.

 A little fun at someone else's expense.  A small lesson in life.

Certainly no reason to wring your hands or get your panties in a wad.

Got that Kennedy?







 Skyjacking plane-loads of peaceful people and killing them and thousands of other peaceful people by destroying New York's Trade Center on September 11,




  The streaming of videos of images of masked ter-rorists standing behind Western hostages in Iraq and Saudi Arabia by Arabic satellite stations such as Al-Jazeera and Al-Manar and Islamist websites such as Muntadiyat al-Mahdi for the titillation of their Jihadist populations or terrorization of the more westernized citizens of Muslim states have become all too common.  This is state and religious propaganda calculated to produce a desired effect.  And the American news media have suppressed these images for their own calculated purposes.

And so we ask you, has Barack Hussein Obama, whether President, Senator, community organizer, or student, ever denounced these gruesome, totally outrageous acts?  If he has, our biased press has managed to refrain from publicizing it.


--steeped in Islamic lore from early child- hood and so under its psychological control that he, as President of the United Stated, did not hesitate to bow down before and kiss the ring of the Saudi king as the king and his attendants looked down upon him in astonished but smiling satisfaction.




Islam a peaceful religion??? Millions of these sons-of-bitches are plotting as we speak to destroy our country and our way of life any way they can. Some of them are here among us now.
They don't want to convert you and don't want to rule you. You are a vile infestation of Allah's paradise. They don't give a shit how pro-gressive" you are, how peace-loving you are, or how much you sym-pathize with their cause.

They want you dead, and think it is God's will for them to do it. And you think Bush and Cheney are your worst enemies?

/No. 10. Patton helmet.bmp

    Some of you think if we give them a hug or listen to them, then they'll like us... and if you agree? Then you are a dumb ass!

    If they manage to get their hands on a nuke, chemical agents, or even some anthrax -- you will wish to God we had hunted them down and killed THEM while we had the chance.

     Stop bitchin' about your damn Health Care, Social Security, Gas prices, and your measly 3.25% unemployment rate...and start worrying about you, your family's, and your friends' asses.

     How many more Americans must be beheaded before you stop blaming Bush for all your troubles --  

You've fallen asleep AGAIN, maggots!
And you may not get another chance!


and pass this on to any and every person you give-a-damn about.. if you ever gave a damn about anything.



* * *

News Flash, June 8, 2006, Zarqawi is killed by US F-16 bomb attack.  See story on New Horizons.   But first, some more pictures of this insane monster.

Zarqawi when he was riding high.

Finally, even his own people had enough of the monster and ratted him out.






Zarqawi ends in a mass of rubble.                     












     Al Jazeera, barely noticing this signal event, reported the circumstances of Zarqawi's passing in a brief, but surprisingly objective story -- at least the one that was published for Western consumption.  We must presume that Al Jazeera's Muslim viewers were provided a more elegant description of Zarqawi's glorious ascension to Paradise and his assigned bevy of nubile virgins.

    The New York Times referred to the monster as "Mr. Zarqawi," which, of course, was neither his true name nor customary title, but, we must suppose, was done so out of respect for the recently departed and the fune-real atmosphere of the ultra Liberal Times.  Beyond a shadow of doubt, these purveyors of "all the news that's fit to print," found little to interest them in this eminently newsworthy event.

  However, the New York Times did find occasion to depart from its subdued recounting of this signal event by noting that "American military commanders" had claimed that Zarqawi had beheaded certain unnamed victims, completely ignoring the fact that the monster had carefully filmed his several decapitations in excruciating detail and then sent the film to be released on television.  But neither the Times nor any other American news service saw fit to publish these gruesome images, leaving it to bloggers and Michael Savage to do so.  God forbid that the Liberal press would ever show us the true faces of our enemies, or even name them.

 The ultra Liberal Washington Post was somewhat more expansive, publishing an obituary which recounted Zarqa- wi's feats--while assuring us that his murderous associates were almost entirely native Iraqis even though their leader was born a Jordanian. 

 Neither the New York Times nor the Washington Post thought it relevant to report that the government of Jordan had immediately announced that it would not allow Zarqa-wi's corpse to enter Jordan for burial, although the Post did report that he was a member of a Bedouin tribe, as if such honor disposed of the matter.  And so we are left to won-der just what will be done with this sadistic murderer's mortal remains.

   The Washington Post did briefly remind us of some of the victims of Zarqawi's mad fury by reporting --

      "In May 2004, he personally inaugurated a wave of hostage-takings and beheadings in Iraq by decapitating Nicholas Berg, 26, a businessman from Pennsylvania, and posting the videotaped episode on the Internet. Later, he and his followers circulated videos showing the decapitations of two other Americans, Eugene "Jack" Armstrong, 52, a native of Hillsdale, Mich., and Jack Hensley, 48, of Marietta, Ga."

     But the Washington Post didn't offer a breath of con-demnation of such brutality, and certainly no photo-graphs of his victims.  Heaven's to Betsy that Americans should not know the real face of our deadly enemies!

    And so Zarkawi's admirers sent him off to Paradise and, we trust, his 27 virgins promised by Allah.  Home is the hunter, home from the hill.  The Washington Post even gave us the following heroic picture of Zarqawi, suitably presented against a celestial background. (Although I'm damned if I know what that contraption is on his left arm.)




* * *

     Well, now that we have had a fair look at the faces of bona fide Muslim Terrorists despite the cover-up of the American Press, let's scroll forward to 2012 where, to bolster Barack Obama's declining popularity, the Liberal Press, represented by Time Magazine's Managing Editor, Richard Stengel, proclaimed on MSNBC’s Morning Joe, that Libya's radical Salafi's are like American T-Partiers.







Obama administration story on Libya just not adding up


   Friday, Sep 28, 2012 at 1:10 PM PDT

   On radio this morning, Glenn talked about the steady flow of misinformation that has come from the administration regarding the terrorist attack on the United States Embassy in Libya. The media has followed suit with even more misinformation – including Time magazine whose Managing Editor likened a radical Jihadist group to the Tea Party on MSNBC’s Morning Joe.

   On Morning Joe, Time’s Richard Stengel said, “We have a great piece by Bobby Ghosh, who’s been on here before about the rise of the Salafis, in the Middle East, they’re the Tea Party of Muslim democracy, and that’s a fantastic, insightful story as well.”

   “Do you have any Salafis are?” Glenn asked. “Not really good guys.”

   The New York Times ran an op/ed in August that described the Salafis as one of the most radical groups in the Middle East:

   In Tunisia, Salafis started the Reform Front party in May and led protests, including in Sidi Bouzid. This summer, they’ve repeatedly attacked symbols of the new freedom of speech, ransacking an art gallery and blocking Sufi musicians and political comedians from performing. In Egypt, Salafis emerged last year from obscurity, hastily formed parties, and in January won 25 percent of the seats in parliament — second only to the 84-year-old Muslim Brotherhood. Salafis are a growing influence in Syria’s rebellion. And they have parties or factions in Algeria, Bahrain, Kuwait, Libya, Yemen and among Palestinians.

   Salafis are only one slice of a rapidly evolving Islamist spectrum. The variety of Islamists in the early 21st century recalls socialism’s many shades in the 20th. Now, as then, some Islamists are more hazardous to Western interests and values than others. The Salafis are most averse to minority and women’s rights.

   A common denominator among disparate Salafi groups is inspiration and support from Wahhabis, a puritanical strain of Sunni Islam from Saudi Arabia. Not all Saudis are Wahhabis. Not all Salafis are Wahhabis, either. But Wahhabis are basically all Salafis. And many Arabs, particularly outside the sparsely populated Gulf, suspect that Wahhabis are trying to seize the future by aiding and abetting the region’s newly politicized Salafis — as they did 30 years ago by funding the South Asian madrassas that produced Afghanistan’s Taliban.

   Salafis go much further in restricting political and personal life than the larger and more modern Islamist parties that have won electoral pluralities in Egypt, Tunisia and Morocco since October. For most Arabs, the rallying cry is justice, both economic and political. For Salafis, it is also about a virtue that is inflexible and enforceable.

   (End of quote From Time’s Op Ed.)

   The article continues to explain they are also for gender segregation in schools and offices. They are even said to be more anti-West than any other Islamist group, including the Muslim Brotherhood.

   That really sounds like the Tea Party, doesn’t it?




·                            My Disqus5

   Sam Fisher  2 hours ago

   First who reads Time magazine any more besides Obama? They can’t tell the truth seeing how most of Obama’s coworkers are Muslim brotherhood. The left think we are terrorist but are happily holding hands with the Muslim brotherhood but if you’re a Christian than you are a bigot even tho they know nothing about you. double standard anyone? 


   Notice how the propaganda distortions of the Tea Party continue - now we are likened to the extremists who attacked our embassies and killed the ambassador and three others in Libya. One more round of scare tactics by Obama and friends who are so desperate to have him hold onto power.


   The administration story does not add up for a simple reason - they are in it up to their necks in deeds they want left under wraps. They need to keep the lid upon this until the elections are past; so the constant spin, denials, distortions and distractions of them and the MSM for their god-king Obama.

   Benghazi-gate needs to come out in full to the public, and especially for the families of those four men who died, and then let justice be done. May God deliver the truth swift and sure as He deems it to be best; and may He bring all criminals in this mess and the coverup to justice.


   Keep diggin', the truth is worse than you might think. The Drudge winks I thinks.


   No matter how bad it is, the truth still needs to come out; and when it does I feel the end will be at hand for the Obama administration. We need to keep digging and be patient, God is working well and fast, all is coming together soon.
   Do you think we may actually see a Presidential resignation shortly?


   It boggles my mind that the libs can swallow all of the half truths and down right lies this pres and administration tells about so easily without getting even a little upset. One of them lies and the rest swear to it and they all look incompetent and foolish, not to mention immoral when the truth is finally told and proved. That obam told this lie over and over again at the UN is an embarrasment to our country and his office. At that point it well an established fact that the film clip as the cause had been totally discredited. The world must think we Americans are incredibly stupid fools. I am personally mortified and embarrassed that the polls still show him as a contender much less it being a close race. What the hell will it take to wake people up?


   Hey Glenn, do you expect Time or any other Obama media outlet to tell the truth? I do see that with the arrest of the Anti-Islamic Movie we no longer have free speech, unless it's pro-leftist. If this had happened to any liberal Bollywood movie person when Bush was in we'd be overwhelmed with the press knocking him. That's America now.


   Glenn, you're forgetting the fake Ant-Islamist film maker who was a FED snitch.
   The arrest of the Anti-Muslim video maker was working with the Islamists to give Obamaladen cover to blame him (who is not a Copt) instead of the actual terrorists themselves so the UN can implement their Islamophobia laws globally. Hilary Clinton already signed it at the UN and if congress passes it, freedom is toast. Also, DOJ put in a good word for him in 2010 so he sentence was reduced.


   It really doesn't matter what Obama says or does, because he is not the president. The position is VOID, and filled with a black mark. It is nonexistant because a man who sits in the chair does not have the credentials to BECOME the president in the first place. The position is VOID. He doesn't even have a birth certificate. That is because he was born in hell, where they don't issue birth certificates.

* * *











This site is being built  from the ground up by a total amateur  using MS Front Page.  And, please, no wise cracks, such as "It looks like it."    

              * * *    

Are you interested in marketing your novel, screenplay or other literary product?




               * * *


Help support this site by ordering your Amazon products -- and they have a lot of them --  through their link below.  It won't cost you any more and it will be a great help for us.






      Postal: The Howard Beale Memorial Society 

                   237 Town Center West, #252   

                    Santa Maria, California 93458


     See: ABOUT US  for complete contact list.

           Copyright © 2005

          Page last modified: 09/27/2012


                                   Memberships and Contributions       

      Memberships click   APPLICATION   (Annual Dues  $20.00)

       Donations  click   BUT NOT UNTIL FURTHER NOTICE

                By check, mail to our postal address.  PAY PAL SCREWED UP

 An Aventura Productions  Client.